Description Usage Arguments Details Value Negative, non-positive, and saturated values Missing values Weighted normalization Robustness Using known/previously estimated channel offsets Author(s) References See Also Examples
Weighted affine normalization between channels and arrays.
This method will remove curvature in the M vs A plots that are due to an affine transformation of the data. In other words, if there are (small or large) biases in the different (red or green) channels, biases that can be equal too, you will get curvature in the M vs A plots and this type of curvature will be removed by this normalization method.
Moreover, if you normalize all slides at once, this method will also bring the signals on the same scale such that the log-ratios for different slides are comparable. Thus, do not normalize the scale of the log-ratios between slides afterward.
It is recommended to normalize as many slides as possible in one run. The result is that if creating log-ratios between any channels and any slides, they will contain as little curvature as possible.
Furthermore, since the relative scale between any two channels on any two slides will be one if one normalizes all slides (and channels) at once it is possible to add or multiply with the same constant to all channels/arrays without introducing curvature. Thus, it is easy to rescale the data afterwards as demonstrated in the example.
1 2 3 |
X |
An NxK |
weights |
If |
typeOfWeights |
A |
method |
A |
constraint |
Constraint making the bias parameters identifiable.
See |
satSignal |
Signals equal to or above this threshold will not be used in the fitting. |
... |
Other arguments passed to |
.fitOnly |
If |
A line is fitted robustly through the (y_R,y_G) observations using an iterated re-weighted principal component analysis (IWPCA), which minimized the residuals that are orthogonal to the fitted line. Each observation is down-weighted by the inverse of the absolute residuals, i.e. the fit is done in L_1.
A NxK matrix
of the normalized channels.
The fitted model is returned as attribute modelFit
.
Affine normalization applies equally well to negative values. Thus,
contrary to normalization methods applied to log-ratios, such as curve-fit
normalization methods, affine normalization, will not set these to NA
.
Data points that are saturated in one or more channels are not used to estimate the normalization function, but they are normalized.
The estimation of the affine normalization function will only be made
based on complete non-saturated observations, i.e. observations that
contains no NA
values nor saturated values as defined by satSignal
.
Each data point/observation, that is, each row in X
, which is a
vector of length K, can be assigned a weight in [0,1] specifying how much
it should affect the fitting of the affine normalization function.
Weights are given by argument weights
,
which should be a numeric
vector
of length N. Regardless of weights,
all data points are normalized based on the fitted normalization
function.
By default, the model fit of affine normalization is done in L_1
(method="L1"
). This way, outliers affect the parameter estimates
less than ordinary least-square methods.
For further robustness, downweight outliers such as saturated signals, if possible.
We do not use Tukey's biweight function for reasons similar to those
outlined in calibrateMultiscan
().
If the channel offsets can be assumed to be known, then it is
possible to fit the affine model with no (zero) offset, which
formally is a linear (proportional) model, by specifying
argument center=FALSE
.
In order to do this, the channel offsets have to be subtracted
from the signals manually before normalizing, e.g.
Xa <- t(t(X)-a)
where e
is vector
of length
ncol(X)
. Then normalize by
Xn <- normalizeAffine(Xa, center=FALSE)
.
You can assert that the model is fitted without offset by
stopifnot(all(attr(Xn, "modelFit")$adiag == 0))
.
Henrik Bengtsson
[1] Henrik Bengtsson and Ola Hössjer, Methodological Study of Affine Transformations of Gene Expression Data, Methodological study of affine transformations of gene expression data with proposed robust non-parametric multi-dimensional normalization method, BMC Bioinformatics, 2006, 7:100.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 | pathname <- system.file("data-ex", "PMT-RGData.dat", package="aroma.light")
rg <- read.table(pathname, header=TRUE, sep="\t")
nbrOfScans <- max(rg$slide)
rg <- as.list(rg)
for (field in c("R", "G"))
rg[[field]] <- matrix(as.double(rg[[field]]), ncol=nbrOfScans)
rg$slide <- rg$spot <- NULL
rg <- as.matrix(as.data.frame(rg))
colnames(rg) <- rep(c("R", "G"), each=nbrOfScans)
layout(matrix(c(1,2,0,3,4,0,5,6,7), ncol=3, byrow=TRUE))
rgC <- rg
for (channel in c("R", "G")) {
sidx <- which(colnames(rg) == channel)
channelColor <- switch(channel, R="red", G="green")
# - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
# The raw data
# - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
plotMvsAPairs(rg[,sidx])
title(main=paste("Observed", channel))
box(col=channelColor)
# - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
# The calibrated data
# - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
rgC[,sidx] <- calibrateMultiscan(rg[,sidx], average=NULL)
plotMvsAPairs(rgC[,sidx])
title(main=paste("Calibrated", channel))
box(col=channelColor)
} # for (channel ...)
# - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
# The average calibrated data
#
# Note how the red signals are weaker than the green. The reason
# for this can be that the scale factor in the green channel is
# greater than in the red channel, but it can also be that there
# is a remaining relative difference in bias between the green
# and the red channel, a bias that precedes the scanning.
# - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
rgCA <- rg
for (channel in c("R", "G")) {
sidx <- which(colnames(rg) == channel)
rgCA[,sidx] <- calibrateMultiscan(rg[,sidx])
}
rgCAavg <- matrix(NA_real_, nrow=nrow(rgCA), ncol=2)
colnames(rgCAavg) <- c("R", "G")
for (channel in c("R", "G")) {
sidx <- which(colnames(rg) == channel)
rgCAavg[,channel] <- apply(rgCA[,sidx], MARGIN=1, FUN=median, na.rm=TRUE)
}
# Add some "fake" outliers
outliers <- 1:600
rgCAavg[outliers,"G"] <- 50000
plotMvsA(rgCAavg)
title(main="Average calibrated (AC)")
# - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
# Normalize data
# - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
# Weight-down outliers when normalizing
weights <- rep(1, nrow(rgCAavg))
weights[outliers] <- 0.001
# Affine normalization of channels
rgCANa <- normalizeAffine(rgCAavg, weights=weights)
# It is always ok to rescale the affine normalized data if its
# done on (R,G); not on (A,M)! However, this is only needed for
# esthetic purposes.
rgCANa <- rgCANa *2^1.4
plotMvsA(rgCANa)
title(main="Normalized AC")
# Curve-fit (lowess) normalization
rgCANlw <- normalizeLowess(rgCAavg, weights=weights)
plotMvsA(rgCANlw, col="orange", add=TRUE)
# Curve-fit (loess) normalization
rgCANl <- normalizeLoess(rgCAavg, weights=weights)
plotMvsA(rgCANl, col="red", add=TRUE)
# Curve-fit (robust spline) normalization
rgCANrs <- normalizeRobustSpline(rgCAavg, weights=weights)
plotMvsA(rgCANrs, col="blue", add=TRUE)
legend(x=0,y=16, legend=c("affine", "lowess", "loess", "r. spline"), pch=19,
col=c("black", "orange", "red", "blue"), ncol=2, x.intersp=0.3, bty="n")
plotMvsMPairs(cbind(rgCANa, rgCANlw), col="orange", xlab=expression(M[affine]))
title(main="Normalized AC")
plotMvsMPairs(cbind(rgCANa, rgCANl), col="red", add=TRUE)
plotMvsMPairs(cbind(rgCANa, rgCANrs), col="blue", add=TRUE)
abline(a=0, b=1, lty=2)
legend(x=-6,y=6, legend=c("lowess", "loess", "r. spline"), pch=19,
col=c("orange", "red", "blue"), ncol=2, x.intersp=0.3, bty="n")
|
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.