correctUnmix | R Documentation |
This function provides a way to reduce the defects in the spectral unmixing, by creating a secondary correction matrix, which is symmetrical.
correctUnmix(unmixFlowObj, corrMat, transCoFacs = 400)
unmixFlowObj |
A flowframe or flowset post unmixing. |
corrMat |
A correction matrix. If this is the first round, the
executionof this function needs to be preceeded by the generation of this
matrix, for example by using the |
transCoFacs |
If transformation should be performed, the transformation cofactors can be added here. Three possible inputs: a vector with specific cofactors for each variable, a set value that will be used for all variables, and FALSE. Note: It might be good to set this to FALSE in the final round, to optimize the transoformations externally. |
The unmixed flow object, now corrected with the values from the corrMat.
specUnmix
, arcTrans
,
corrMatCreate
# Load uncompensated data
data(fullPanel)
# Load the spectral unmixing matrix generated with controls from the same
# experiment. These can be generated using the specMatCalc function.
data(specMat)
# And now unmix
fullPanelUnmix <- specUnmix(fullPanel, specMat)
# Create an empty unmixinng matrix
corrMat <- corrMatCreate(specMat)
# Now correct the data with this. In the first instance, this will of course
# not have any effect, more than transformation, as the corrMat is empty.
fullPanelCorr <- correctUnmix(fullPanelUnmix, corrMat)
# This now needs to be investigated, to identify any possible compensation
# defects. This is most easily done with the oneVsAllPlot executed in the
# following way:
## Not run:
oneVsAllPlot(fullPanelCorr)
## End(Not run)
# One obvoius defect that shows when doing this is between CD56 and IgM:
oneVsAllPlot(fullPanelCorr, "BV650_CD56", saveResult = FALSE)
# This is corrcted the following way:
corrMat["BV650_CD56", "AF647_IgM"] <- -0.03
fullPanelCorr <- correctUnmix(fullPanelUnmix, corrMat)
oneVsAllPlot(fullPanelCorr, "BV650_CD56", saveResult = FALSE)
# This process is iterated until there are no remaining artifacts. Good help
# to do this is a set of fluorescence-minus-one controls. If that is not
# available, a rule of thumb is that if the signal in marker x is
# strongly negatively correlated to marker y, so that highly
# single-x-posisive values are below zero, then this is with all likelihood
# an artifact. The situation becomes more complicated with strong positive
# correlations, as they can occur in biology, so there one has to take more
# care and keep the marker biology in mind.
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.