library(knitr) opts_chunk$set(fig.width=12, fig.height=8)
Chromatin interaction analysis with paired-end tag sequencing (ChIA-PET) is a recent method to study protein-mediated interactions at a genome-wide scale. Like most techniques for studying chromatin interaction it is based on chromosome conformation capture technology. Unlike 3C, 4C and 5C, however, it can detect interactions genome-wide, and includes a ChIP step to purify interactions involving a protein of interest.
The raw data from ChIA-PET is in the form of paired-end reads attached to one of two linker sequences. Reads with chimeric linkers are removed, and the data is aligned to the reference genome. The ChIA-PET tool can then be used to find pairs of regions ("anchors") which have a significant number of reads mapping between them and therefore represent biologically meaningful chromatin interactions in the sample.
First we need to load the GenomicInteractions package, and the mm9 reference genome:
library(GenomicInteractions) library(InteractionSet) library(GenomicRanges)
We can then read in our data directly from the output of the ChIA-PET tool. At this stage we can also provide information about the cell type and a description tag for the experiment. The data is taken from Li et al., 2012, published in Cell. They have used antibodies against the initiation form of Pol II, which you would expect to find at active promoters, and we are looking at data from the K562 myelogenous leukemia cell line. The data should therefore give us an insight into the processes which regulate genes that are being actively transcribed.
chiapet.data = system.file("extdata/k562.rep1.cluster.pet3+.txt", package="GenomicInteractions") k562.rep1 = makeGenomicInteractionsFromFile(chiapet.data, type="chiapet.tool", experiment_name="k562", description="k562 pol2 8wg16")
This loads the data into a GenomicInteractions
object, which consists of two
linked GenomicRanges
objects containing the anchors in each interaction, as
well as the p-value, FDR and the number of reads supporting each interaction.
The metadata we have added can easily be accesed, and edited:
name(k562.rep1) description(k562.rep1) = "PolII-8wg16 Chia-PET for K562"
As can the data from the ChIA-PET experiment:
head(interactionCounts(k562.rep1)) head((k562.rep1)$fdr) hist(-log10(k562.rep1$p.value))
The two linked GRanges
objects can be returned, but not altered in-place:
anchorOne(k562.rep1) anchorTwo(k562.rep1)
GenomicInteractions
objects can easily handle interactions detected between
chromosomes, known as trans-chromosomal interactions, since the anchors can
be at any point along the genome. is.trans
returns a logical vector;
likewise is.cis
is the opposite of this function.
sprintf("Percentage of trans-chromosomal interactions %.2f", 100*sum(is.trans(k562.rep1))/length(k562.rep1))
The length of each interaction is not stored as metadata, but we can calculate the distance of each interaction using either the inner edge, outer edge or midpoints of the anchors. This is undefined for inter-chromosomal interactions, so NA is returned, so it is important to exclude these interactions from some analyses.
head(calculateDistances(k562.rep1, method="midpoint"))
GenomicRanges
objects can be subsetted by either integer or logical vectors like
most R objects, and also BioConductor Rle
objects.
k562.rep1[1:10] # first interactions in the dataset k562.rep1[sample(length(k562.rep1), 100)] # 100 interactions subsample k562.cis = k562.rep1[is.cis(k562.rep1)]
The length of each interaction is not stored as metadata, but we can calculate
the distance of each interaction using either the inner edge, outer edge or
midpoints of the anchors. Since this is undefinable for trans-chromosomal interactions
it is best to first subset only cis interactions before calling calculateDistances
,
otherwise NA
s will be present in the returned vector.
head(calculateDistances(k562.cis, method="midpoint")) k562.short = k562.cis[calculateDistances(k562.cis) < 1e6] # subset shorter interactions hist(calculateDistances(k562.short))
We can also subset based on the properties of the linked GRanges
objects.
chrom = c("chr17", "chr18") sub = as.vector(seqnames(anchorOne(k562.rep1)) %in% chrom & seqnames(anchorTwo(k562.rep1)) %in% chrom) k562.rep1 = k562.rep1[sub]
Genomic Interaction data is often used to look at the interactions between different elements in the genome, which are believed to have different functional roles. Interactions between promoters and their transcription termination sites, for example, are thought to be a by-product of the transcription process, whereas long-range interactions with enhancers play a role in gene regulation.
Since GenomicInteractions
is based on GenomicRanges
, it is very easy to
interrogate GenomicInteractions
objects using GenomicRanges
data. In the
example, we want to annotate interactions that overlap the promoters,
transcription termination sites or the body of any gene. Since this can
be a time-consuming and data-heavy process, this example runs the analysis
for only chromosomes 17 & 18.
First we need the list of RefSeq transcripts:
library(GenomicFeatures) hg19.refseq.db <- makeTxDbFromUCSC(genome="hg19", table="refGene") refseq.genes = genes(hg19.refseq.db) refseq.transcripts = transcriptsBy(hg19.refseq.db, by="gene") non_pseudogene = names(refseq.transcripts) %in% unlist(refseq.genes$gene_id) refseq.transcripts = refseq.transcripts[non_pseudogene]
Rather than downloading the whole Refseq database, these are provided for chromosomes 17 & 18:
data("hg19.refseq.transcripts") refseq.transcripts = hg19.refseq.transcripts
We can then use functions from GenomicRanges
to call promoters and
terminators for these transcripts. We have taken promoter regions to be within
2.5kb of an annotated TSS and terminators to be within 1kb of the end of an
annotated transcript. Since genes can have multiple transcripts, they can also
have multiple promoters/terminators, so these are GRangesList
objects, which makes
handling these objects slightly more complicated.
refseq.promoters = promoters(refseq.transcripts, upstream=2500, downstream=2500) # unlist object so "strand" is one vector refseq.transcripts.ul = unlist(refseq.transcripts) # terminators can be called as promoters with the strand reversed strand(refseq.transcripts.ul) = ifelse(strand(refseq.transcripts.ul) == "+", "-", "+") refseq.terminators.ul = promoters(refseq.transcripts.ul, upstream=1000, downstream=1000) # change back to original strand strand(refseq.terminators.ul) = ifelse(strand(refseq.terminators.ul) == "+", "-", "+") # `relist' maintains the original names and structure of the list refseq.terminators = relist(refseq.terminators.ul, refseq.transcripts)
These can be used to subset a GenomicInteractions
object directly from
GRanges
using the GenomicRanges
overlaps methods. findOverlaps
called on
a GenomicInteractions
object will return a list containing Hits
objects for
both anchors.
We can finds any interactions involving a RefSeq promoter:
subsetByFeatures(k562.rep1, unlist(refseq.promoters))
However, one of the most powerful features in the GenomicInteractions
package
is the ability to annotate each anchor with a list of genomic regions and then
summarise interactions according to these features. This annotation is
implemented as metadata columns for the anchors in the GenomicInteractions
object and so is fast, and facilitates more complex analyses.
The order in which we annotate the anchors is important, since each anchor can
only have one node.class
. The first listed take precedence. Any regions not
overlapping ranges in annotation.features
will be labelled as distal
.
annotation.features = list(promoter=refseq.promoters, terminator=refseq.terminators, gene.body=refseq.transcripts) annotateInteractions(k562.rep1, annotation.features) annotationFeatures(k562.rep1)
We can now find interactions involving promoters using the annotated
node.class
for each anchor:
p.one = anchorOne(k562.rep1)$node.class == "promoter" p.two = anchorTwo(k562.rep1)$node.class == "promoter" k562.rep1[p.one|p.two]
This information can be used to categorise interactions into promoter-distal,
promoter-terminator etc. A table of interaction types can be generated with
categoriseInteractions
:
categoriseInteractions(k562.rep1)
Alternatively, we can subset the object based on interaction type:
k562.rep1[isInteractionType(k562.rep1, "terminator", "gene.body")]
The 3 most common node.class
values have short functions defined for convenience
(see ?is.pp
for a complete list):
k562.rep1[is.pp(k562.rep1)] # promoter-promoter interactions k562.rep1[is.dd(k562.rep1)] # distal-distal interactions k562.rep1[is.pt(k562.rep1)] # promoter-terminator interactions
Summary plots of interactions classes can easily be produced to get an overall feel for the data:
plotInteractionAnnotations(k562.rep1, other=5)
viewpoints
will only take those interactions with a certain node.class
:
plotInteractionAnnotations(k562.rep1, other=5, viewpoints="promoter")
These are also combined in the function plotSummaryStats
.
The summariseByFeatures
allows us to look in more detail at interactions
involving a specific set of loci. In this example we use all RefSeq promoters,
which we already have loaded in a GRangesList
object.
It is however possible to use any dataset which can be represented as a named
GRanges
object, for example transcription-factor ChIP data, predicted
cis-regulatory sites or certain categories of genes.
The categories are generated automatically from the annotated node.class
values in the object.
k562.rep1.promoter.annotation = summariseByFeatures(k562.rep1, refseq.promoters, "promoter", distance.method="midpoint", annotate.self=TRUE) colnames(k562.rep1.promoter.annotation)
This allows us to very quickly generate summaries of the data and provides a
quick method to isolate genes of interest. In this case we produce lists of
RefSeq IDs, which can easily be converted to EntrezIDs or gene symbols through
existing BioConductor packages (in this case org.Hs.eg.db
provides bimaps between
common human genome annotations).
Which promoters have the strongest Promoter-Promoter interactions based on PET-counts?
i = order(k562.rep1.promoter.annotation$numberOfPromoterPromoterInteractions, decreasing=TRUE)[1:10] k562.rep1.promoter.annotation[i,"Promoter.id"]
Which promoters are contacting the largest number of distal elements?
i = order(k562.rep1.promoter.annotation$numberOfUniquePromoterDistalInteractions, decreasing=TRUE)[1:10] k562.rep1.promoter.annotation[i,"Promoter.id"]
What percentage of promoters are in contact with transcription termination sites?
total = sum(k562.rep1.promoter.annotation$numberOfPromoterTerminatorInteractions > 0) sprintf("%.2f%% of promoters have P-T interactions", 100*total/nrow(k562.rep1.promoter.annotation))
Li, Guoliang, et al. "Software ChIA-PET tool for comprehensive chromatin interaction analysis with paired-end tag sequencing." Genome Biol 11 (2010): R22.
Li, Guoliang, et al. "Extensive promoter-centered chromatin interactions provide a topological basis for transcription regulation." Cell 148.1 (2012): 84-98
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.