ChIPanalyser provides a quick an easy method to predict and explain TF binding. The package uses a statistical thermodynamic framework to model the bidning of proteins to DNA. ChIPanalyser makes the assumption that the probability that any given sites along the genome is bound by a TF can be explained by four main factors: DNA accessibility, Binding energy, a scaling factor modulating binding energy ($\lambda$) and number of TF bound ($N$) to DNA. Both $N$ and $\lambda$ are inferred internally by maximisng (or minimising) a goodness of fit metric between predictions and actual ChIP-data. The package will produce a ChIP like profile at a base pair level. As opposed to machine learning type frameworks, if these paramters are known by other means (experimentally), ChIPanalyser does require any training to produce ChIP like profiles. Estimated values can directly be plugged into the model. Furthermore, ChIPanalyser helps gain an understanding of the mechanims behind TF binding as described by (Zabet et al 2015 & Martin and Zabet 2019).
As described above, ChIPAnalyser is based on an approximation of statistical thermodynamics. The core formula describing TF binding is given by : $$P(N,a,\lambda,\omega){j} = \frac{N \cdot a{j} \cdot e^{(\frac{1}{\lambda} \cdot \omega_{j})}}{N \cdot a_{j} \cdot e^{(\frac{1}{\lambda} \cdot \omega_{j})}+ L \cdot n \cdot [a_{i} \cdot e^{(\frac{1} \lambda \cdot \omega_j)}]_ {i}} $$ with
The next section will be split between the following subsections
Before going through the inner workings of the package and the work flow,
this section will quickly demonstrate how to load example datasets
stored in the package. This data represents a minimal workable examples for
the different functions. All data is derived from real biological data
in Drosophila melanogaster (The Drosophila melanogaster
genome can be found as a BSgenome
).
library(ChIPanalyser) #Load data data(ChIPanalyserData) # Loading DNASequenceSet from BSgenome object # We recommend using the latest version of the genome # Please ensure that all your data is aligned to the same version of the genome library(BSgenome.Dmelanogaster.UCSC.dm3) DNASequenceSet <-getSeq(BSgenome.Dmelanogaster.UCSC.dm3) #Loading Position Frequency Matrix PFM <- file.path(system.file("extdata",package="ChIPanalyser"),"BCDSlx.pfm") #Checking if correctly loaded ls()
The global environment should now contain a few new variables: DNASequenceSet, PFM, Access, geneRef, eveLocus, eveLocusChip.
DNASequenceSet
is DNAStringSet extracted from the
Drosophila melanogaster genome (BSgenome). It is advised to
use a full genome sequence for this object.
PFM
is a path to file. In this case, it is a Position Frequency Matrix
derived from the Bicoid Transcription factor in Drosophila melanogasterin RAW format.
we provide loading support for JASPAR, Transfac and RAW. If you wish to use any other format,
we suggest to use the MotifDb package (or load PFM as matrix into R) and parse the matrix to ChIPanalyser.
In this scenario, PFMFormat
argument should be set to matrix (see below for more information).
Access
is a GRanges
object containing accessible DNA for
the sequence above.
geneRef
is a GRanges
containing genetic information
(exon, intron, 3'UTR, 5'UTR) for the sequence above.
eveLocus
is a GRanges
object with genomic postion for the eve strip
locus in Drosophila melanogaster.
eveLocusChip
is a data frame with ChIP score in the format of a simple
bed file ( 4 columns : chromosome, start, end and score) for Bicoid
transcription factor.
IMPORTANT: Data sets provided in the package have been currated to meet the size requirements for Bioconductor packages. Please read the instruction below carefully as we will describe how to incorportate your own data into the pipe line.
ChIPAnalyser requires ChIP data in order to infer the optimal set of values that will be assigned to bound Molecules and lambda. The package will maximise (or minimise) a goodness of fit metric between the predictions and ChIP data.
If you have inferred or approximated the values to be assigned to $N$ and $\lambda$ by other means, skip this step and go directly to Advanced Work.
eveLocusChip
can be a connection to your ChIP data, a GRanges of your ChIP
or data frame (bed format style)
loci
is a GRanges object containing loci of interest. Default set as NULL
(see Advanced Work)
eveLocusChip<-processingChIP(profile=eveLocusChip, loci=eveLocus, cores=1) eveLocusChip
The output of processingChIP
returns a ChIPScore
object containing
extracted and normalised ChIP scores, your loci of interest and internal
parameters associated to the ChIP extractions process.
The model relies on a Postion Weight Matrix. genomicProfiles
serve as a way
of storing important paramters. More importantly, this object stores intermediate
results as you make your way through the analysis pipeline.
From a Position Frequency Matrix:
# PFMs are automatically converted to PWM when build genomicProfiles GP<-genomicProfiles(PFM=PFM,PFMFormat="raw") GP
From a Position Weight Matrix:
GP<-genomicProfiles(PWM=PositionWeightMatrix)
As described above, ChIPanalyser infers the optimal combination of bound molecules
and lambda that will maximise (or minimise) a goodness of fit metric.
The following function computes the optimal set of parameters and returns intermediate steps of
the analysis pipeline. To do so, we will be parsing the follwing: a DNA sequence,
a Position Weight Matrix (contained in a genomicProfiles), chromatin States (Accessible DNA - This is optional),
and extracted/normalised experimental ChIP score (result of the processingChIP
function).
## surpress dependency warnings optimal<-suppressWarnings(computeOptimal(genomicProfiles=GP, DNASequenceSet=DNASequenceSet, ChIPScore=eveLocusChip, chromatinState=Access))
NOTE Default Optimal parameters are provided internally as the following:
## Lambda Values seq(0.25,5,by=0.25) ## Bound Molecule Values c(1, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500,1000,2000, 5000,10000,20000,50000, 100000, 200000, 500000, 1000000)
NOTE To change these parameters see Advanced Work
Once computed, we will extract the optimal set of parameters.
optimalParam<-optimal$Optimal optimalParam$OptimalParameters
We can see the opitmal set of parameters suggested by ChIPanalyser.
Despite ChIPanalyser returning suggested optimal parameters, you may wish to visualise the optimal parameters for each paramter combination and choose your own set of parameters. To this effect, we have implemented an Optimal parameter plotting fucntion.
# Plotting Optimal heat maps par(oma=c(0,0,3,0)) layout(matrix(1:8,ncol=4, byrow=T),width=c(6,1.5,6,1.5),height=c(1,1)) plotOptimalHeatMaps(optimalParam,layout=FALSE)
Once satisfied with your choice of optimal parameters, you can extracted the data associated to those parameters. You can select more that one parameter however the values assigned to each argument must be one of the values used for computing the optimal set of parameters.
optimalParam<-searchSites(optimal,lambdaPWM=1.25,BoundMolecules=10000)
The final step is to plot the computed predicted profiles. We provide a plotting function to produce predicted profile plots.
plotOccupancyProfile(predictedProfile=optimalParam$ChIPProfiles, ChIPScore=eveLocusChip, chromatinState=Access, occupancy=optimalParam$Occupancy, goodnessOfFit=optimalParam$goodnessOfFit)
In this section we will describe a more in depth work flow. This will include parameter tweakin, annexe functions and some insights into the outputs of each functions.
Some parameters can be changed between each step of the pipeline. These parameters will enable you to tweak and improve the quality of your analysis.
There are many parameters to choose from. These parameters already have default value assigned to them.
## Suggested Parameters to start with. parameterOptions() ## Changing parameters PO <- parameterOptions(noiseFilter="sigmoid",chipSd=150,chipMean=150,lociWidth=30000)
NOTE If you wish to do so, you can change all your parameters at this step. These parameters will be parsed through the different steps of the pipeline as long as you parse this object to each step of the analysis.
In some case you will not have a pre-determined idea of which loci you wish to look at.
The processingChIP
function offers a few possibilities to work around this issue.
## Top 50 loci based on ChIP score processingChIP(profile="/path/to/ChIP", loci=NULL, reduce=50, parameterOptions=PO) ## Top 50 loci ALSO containing peaks processingChIP(profile="/path/to/ChIP", loci=NULL, reduce=50, peaks="/path/to/peaks", parameterOptions=PO) ## Top 50 loci containing BOTH peaks and Accessible DNA processingChIP(profile="/path/to/ChIP", loci=NULL, reduce=50, peaks="/path/to/peaks", chromatinState="/path/to/chromatinState" parameterOptions=PO)
Loci will be computed internally based on the ChIP score provided. ChIP Scores will be tilled into bins of width equals to the value assigned to the lociWidth
argument in the parameterOptions
object (see above). The default loci width is set at
20 kbp. Top regions are selected based on ordered ChIP scores.
Most genomic formats are supported by ChIPanalyser (wig, bed, bedGraph, bigWig, bigBed). The "path/to/file" may also be a GRanges object.
processingChIP
function returns extracted/Normalised ChIP scores (list of numeric vectors), the loci of inetrest (GRanges), and associated paramters that have been extracted (such as maxSignal and backgroundSignal). The loci are the top n regions as selected by the reduce argument. Using the loci()
accessor applied on a ChIPScore object will return a GRanges of selected loci. The scores()
accessors applied on a ChIPScore
object will return the normalised scores associated to each Locus.
NOTE This function also supports multi core computing.
Computing the PWM from PFMs can be tweaked by using some additional parameters.
PWMs depend on Base Pair Frequency in the genome of interest. Either you can provide
a vector containing the base pair frequency (A C T G in order) or the genomicProfiles
object will compute it internally if you provide a BSgenome/DNAStringSet.
str(genomicProfiles()) GP <- genomicProfiles(PFM=PFM, PFMFormat="raw", BPFrequency=DNASequenceSet) GP
The genomicProfiles
object also contains all parameters described
in parameterOptions
. This makes the parsing of parameters straight forward between each step of
the analysis pipeline. The genomicProfiles
object will be updated internally as you provided More
parameters. This object will also be the main object that you will parse through each step of the analysis.
There are a few different ways to add new paramters:
## Parsing pre computed parameters (processingChIP function) GP<-genomicProfiles(PFM=PFM, PFMFormat="raw", BPFrequency=DNASequenceSet, ChIPScore=ChIPScore) ## Parsing pre assigned function (parameterOptions) parameterOptions<-parameterOptions(lambdaPWM=c(1,2,3), boundMolecules=c(5,50,500)) GP<-genomicProfiles(PFM=PFM, PFMFormat="raw", BPFrequency=DNASequenceSet, parameterOptions=parameterOptions) ## Direct parameter assignement GP<-genomicProfiles(PFM=PFM, PFMFormat="raw", BPFrequency=DNASequenceSet, lambdaPWM=c(1,2,3),boundMolecules=c(4,500,8000))
NOTE parameterOptions
object can be parsed to any function of the analysis pipeline if parameters need to be changed along the way.
The optimal set of parameters can be computed on custom set of values for $N$ and $\lambda$. As described above,
there a few ways to modify parameter Options. If you were to assign more than two values to both of these slots, these new values will be used as "Optimal Parameters Combinations".
NOTE parameterOptions
is inherited by genomicProfiles
hence why you can also assign those paramters to the genomicProfiles
contructor.
The computeOptimal
function offers a few more options that we will briefly describe here.
## Setting custom parameters OP<-parameterOptions(lambdaPWM=seq(1,10,by=0.5), boundMolecules=seq(1,100000, length.out=20)) ## Computing ONLY Optimal Parameters and MSE as goodness Of Fit metric optimal<-computeOptimal(genomicProfiles=GP, DNASequenceSet=DNASequenceSet, ChIPScore=eveLocusChip, chromatinState=Access, parameterOptions=OP, optimalMethod="MSE", returnAll=FALSE) ### Computing ONLY Optimal Parameters and using Rank slection method optimal<-computeOptimal(genomicProfiles=GP, DNASequenceSet=DNASequenceSet, ChIPScore=eveLocusChip, chromatinState=Access, parameterOptions=OP, optimalMethod="all", rank=TRUE)
When the returnAll
argument is set to FALSE, only the optimal parameters Will
be return. No internal Data will be returned.
Optimal Parameters are determined by selecting the best perfomring combination of paremeters. The goodness of fit score for each combination is averaged over all regions considered. When the rank
argument is set to TRUE, the optimal parameters will be based on which combination of parameters showed the best performance for each regions individually. Parameter combinations are ranked based on how many individual regions performed best with that specific set of parameters.
Finally, optimalMethod
argument will enbale you to selected the goodness Of Fit method you wish to use.
Now that you have selected custom parameters, you will want to plot the associated heat maps.
## Extracted Optimal Parameters optimalParam<-optimal$Optimal ## Plotting heat maps plotOptimalHeatMaps(optimalParam,overlay=TRUE)
It is possible to plot an overlay of the optimal set of paramters of all goodness Of Fit methods.
Using the overlay
argument in the plotting function will plot overlay the top 10% of optimal parameters as selected by each Goodness of fit metric.
Let's imagine that when looking at the optimal parameter heat maps, you would like to run a combination of parameters that is not in the ones that had been provided but you do not want to re-compute optimal parameters. Or Let us imagine that you have already an estimate of number of bound molecules. ChIPanalyser provides functions that will enable you to run the piple line on individual parameter combinations. The steps are described as following:
## Creating genomic Profiles object with PFMs and associated parameters GP <- genomicProfiles(PFM=PFM,PFMFormat="raw",BPFrequency=DNASequenceSet, lambdaPWM=1, boundMolecules=58794) ## Computing Genome Wide Score required GW <- computeGenomeWideScores(genomicProfiles=GP, DNASequenceSet=DNASequenceSet, chromatinState=Access) GW ## Computing PWM score above threshold pwm <- computePWMScore(genomicProfiles=GW, DNASequenceSet=DNASequenceSet, loci=eveLocusChip, chromatinState=Access) pwm ## Computing Occupancy of sites above threshold occup <- computeOccupancy(genomicProfiles=pwm) occup ## Compute ChIP seq like profiles chip <- computeChIPProfile(genomicProfiles=occup, loci=eveLocusChip) chip ## Compute goodness Of Fit of model accu <- profileAccuracyEstimate(genomicProfiles=chip, ChIPScore=eveLocusChip) accu
NOTE These functions can compute multiple parameter combinations if needed. computeOptimal
is essentially a combination of these functions with a little more magic to it.
For more information on these functions see Parameters Discription
Finally, you can plot your newly computed profiles.
plotOccupancyProfile(predictedProfile=chip, ChIPScore=eveLocusChip, chromatinState=Access, occupancy=occup, goodnessOfFit=accu, geneRef=geneRef)
In this case we have also added a gene reference object. This object is a GRanges object containing the postion of various genetic elements such as 3'UTR, 5'UTR, introns , etc
NOTE plotOccupancyProfile
offers the possibility to customise graphical parameters. Unfortunately, plotOptimalHeatMaps
offers limited graphical parameter customisation.
In the following section, we will describe the different parameters present in both parameterOptions
and genomicProfiles
.
Information concerning arguments to functions are described in the manual pages for each function.
As a reminder, here are the parameter options for the parameterOptions
object.
Parameters are divided into different categories depending on when they are required internally.
parameterOptions()
ChIPscore
object , result of processingChIP
.ChIPscore
object , result of processingChIP
.TRUE
, natural log will be used otherwise log2 will be used.max
returns the highest PWM score regardless of strand. sum
returns the sum of PWM scores over both strands.
mean
returns the average PWM score oer both strands. It should be noted that this argument is only relevant when both strands are considered. See below.+-
or -+
, plus only +
or negative only -
.As you can see, some of these parameters are used during multiple steps of the analysis. If these paremeters have been changed in either a parameterOptions
object
or genomicProfiles
object, please ensure that you parse these objects to each function. Each function will extract the values you have assigned to each parameter
and use those values for analysis. It is possible to update, these parameters between each step of the analysis however, we recommend to set all parameters beforehand
to avoid unwanted parameter mismatch.
Next, we will describe the content of genomicProfiles
objects. As a reminder, genomicProfiles
object have the following structure:
str(genomicProfiles())
As you can see, we are using the structure function to show all internal slots. The genomicProfiles
object inherit from parameterOptions
,
contain slots that are not user updatetable and finally the show method applied to genomicProfiles
varies with each step of the analysis.
This is intended to reduce information overload when "looking" at an object.
PFMFormat
can be one of the following: RAW, JASPAR, transfac or matrix. Matrix format is used if the provided
PFM is an R matrix. DNAStringSet
object or BSgenome
object is provided to this argument. All other parameters have either been explained above or are part of the internal working of the package. These parameters are mainly used to keep track of the advancement of the analysis between each step. They should not be changed by user.
Finally, we provide a list of setter/getter functions for each slot:
## Accessors and Setters for parameterOptions and genomicProfiles avrageExpPWMScore(obj) backgroundSignal(obj) backgroundSignal(obj)<-value boundMolecules(obj) boundMolecules(obj)<-value BPFrequency(obj) BPFrequency(obj)<-value chipMean(obj) chipMean(obj)<-value chipSd(obj) chipSd(obj)<-value chipSmooth(obj) chipSmooth(obj)<-value DNASequenceLength(obj) drop(obj) lambdaPWM(obj) lambdaPWM(obj)<-value lociWidth(obj) lociWidth(obj)<-value maxPWMScore(obj) maxSignal(obj) maxSignal(obj)<-value minPWMScore(obj) naturalLog(obj) naturalLog(obj)<-value noiseFilter(obj) noiseFilter(obj)<-value noOfSites(obj) noOfSites(obj)<-value PFMFormat(obj) PFMFormat(obj)<-value ploidy(obj) ploidy(obj)<-value PositionFrequencyMatrix(obj) PositionFrequencyMatrix(obj)<-value PositionWeightMatrix(obj) PositionWeightMatrix<-value profiles(obj) PWMpseudocount(obj) PWMpseudocount(obj)<-value PWMThreshold(obj) PWMThreshold(obj)<-value removeBackground(obj) removeBackground(obj)<-value stepSize(obj) stepSize(obj)<-value strandRule(obj) strandRule(obj)<-value whichstrand(obj) whichstrand(obj)<-value ## ChIPScore slots accessors loci(obj) scores(obj)
sessionInfo()
Zabet NR, Adryan B (2015) Estimating binding properties of transcription factors from genome-wide binding profiles. Nucleic Acids Res., 43, 84–94.
Any scripts or data that you put into this service are public.
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.